Ohio State is in the process of revising websites and program materials to accurately reflect compliance with the law. While this work occurs, language referencing protected class status or other activities prohibited by Ohio Senate Bill 1 may still appear in some places. However, all programs and activities are being administered in compliance with federal and state law.

Quantitative Psychology Brownbag with Dr. Felix Thoemmes

Dr. Felix Thoemmes
Mon, November 1, 2021
12:30 pm - 1:30 pm
Zoom Session

Zoom Link

The Quantitative Psychology brownbag with Dr. Felix Thoemmes of November 1, 2021, Monday @ 12:30-1:30pm EDT will be a joint session organized by several other programs around the nation:

  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
  • University of Notre Dame
  • University of Virginia
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of South Carolina

Participating programs also include those from York University, McGill University, and University of Missouri!


Title: Estimating bias and sensitivity of front-door models

Abstract: The front-door criterion is a heavily underused analytic method to estimate causal effects in the presence of unobserved confounding. One potential reason why this approach has been largely ignored is the strong set of assumptions that need to be invoked. The front-door estimator yields unbiased total effects between a putative cause and an outcome of interest by decomposing a total effect in unbiased component effects. However, this guarantee of unbiasedness rests strictly on a set of assumptions that can be violated in practice. To illuminate these assumptions and the severity of bias due to their violation, we derive exact bias formulas for each possible violation. We further compare the performance of the front-door estimate under violations with the performance of a naive estimator (that simply regresses the outcome on the putative cause). We show that some violations of assumptions lead to simple confounding bias, but also to collider bias, and bias amplification. We derive all biases analytically, but also supplement our analysis with an extensive simulation, in which we compare biases for a very wide range of parameter values. Using the results from our analysis and simulation, we dissect and explain the nature of bias in the front-door estimate. Finally, we present a simple method to conduct sensitivity analyses  using phantom variables in structural equation models.

 

Dr. Felix Thoemmes works on on topics of quantitative methods and design for the social sciences. In particular, he is interested in causal inference, both model-based and design-based. I have done work on the use of propensity scores with clustered data and am currently finishing up an IES grant on software development for regression-discontinuity designs. Finally, he works on collaborative projects with applied colleagues that span different areas of developmental and health psychology.

 

Recommended Reading (attached)

Thoemmes, F., & Kim, Y. (in press). Bias and sensitivity analyses for linear front-door models. Journal of Causal Inference