Ohio State nav bar

Quantitative Psychology Brownbag

Lisa Wijsen
March 27, 2023
12:30PM - 1:30PM
Zoom

Date Range
Add to Calendar 2023-03-27 12:30:00 2023-03-27 13:30:00 Quantitative Psychology Brownbag The Quantitative Psychology brownbag of March 27, 2023, Monday @ 12:30-1:30pm ET will be a joint session organized by several other programs along with OSU around the nation: University of Notre Dame University of Maryland, College Park University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of Virginia Vanderbilt University University of South Carolina Participating programs also include those from York University, McGill University, University of Missouri, and University of British Columbia! More information about joint-QBB talks is available here: https://jqbb.github.io/  ZOOM link:  https://osu.zoom.us/j/98005183244?pwd=RWk2aG1yeEZ3S2hBTXFUVVpzSEs5Zz09   Dr. Lisa Wijsen Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences University of Amsterdam Title: Values in Psychometrics Abstract: Measuring psychological attributes has become a very normal part of our lives. In the Netherlands, children get tested at 12 years old to help with choosing an appropriate secondary school; when we apply to jobs it is often expected to go through a wide range of psychological assessments, and when we go to a clinical psychologist it is not unusual to be given a diagnostic measurement tool such as the BDI. The role of testing and measurement in our society is often a topic of debate and can be considered a moral choice. Do we want to measure children at an early age? Is it desirable to have test scores determine whether we end up in university or not? What is the right thing to do? However, for the technical field of psychometrics, the moral dimension is less clear. In the field of psychometrics, people often work on highly complex models which often estimate individual differences based on observed scores. The language psychometricians use is strongly model- and mathematics-based, and often strongly separated from applications of psychometrics. Even though this technical work does not seem to be dependent on any type of moral value, when we look closely, we can still discern several (moral) values. In this talk, I will discuss the following four values: that individual differences are quantitative (rather than qualitative), that measurement should be objective in a specific sense, that test items should be fair, and that the utility of a model is more important than its truth. The goal of this talk is not to criticize psychometrics for supporting these values but rather to bring them into the open, and to encourage psychometricians to enter the debate on the moral dimensions of their field.    Dr. Lisa Wijsen is a member of the Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Psychological Methods, at the University of Amsterdam. Her work centers on the history and philosophy underlying psychometrics, which has been published in outlets such as Perspectives on Psychological Science, Psychometrika, and Disputatio. Zoom Department of Psychology ASC-psychmainoffice@osu.edu America/New_York public

The Quantitative Psychology brownbag of March 27, 2023, Monday @ 12:30-1:30pm ET will be a joint session organized by several other programs along with OSU around the nation:

University of Notre Dame
University of Maryland, College Park
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
University of Virginia
Vanderbilt University
University of South Carolina

Participating programs also include those from York University, McGill University, University of Missouri, and University of British Columbia!

More information about joint-QBB talks is available here: https://jqbb.github.io/ 

ZOOM link:  https://osu.zoom.us/j/98005183244?pwd=RWk2aG1yeEZ3S2hBTXFUVVpzSEs5Zz09

 

Dr. Lisa Wijsen
Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences
University of Amsterdam

Title: Values in Psychometrics

Abstract: Measuring psychological attributes has become a very normal part of our lives. In the Netherlands, children get tested at 12 years old to help with choosing an appropriate secondary school; when we apply to jobs it is often expected to go through a wide range of psychological assessments, and when we go to a clinical psychologist it is not unusual to be given a diagnostic measurement tool such as the BDI. The role of testing and measurement in our society is often a topic of debate and can be considered a moral choice. Do we want to measure children at an early age? Is it desirable to have test scores determine whether we end up in university or not? What is the right thing to do? However, for the technical field of psychometrics, the moral dimension is less clear. In the field of psychometrics, people often work on highly complex models which often estimate individual differences based on observed scores. The language psychometricians use is strongly model- and mathematics-based, and often strongly separated from applications of psychometrics. Even though this technical work does not seem to be dependent on any type of moral value, when we look closely, we can still discern several (moral) values. In this talk, I will discuss the following four values: that individual differences are quantitative (rather than qualitative), that measurement should be objective in a specific sense, that test items should be fair, and that the utility of a model is more important than its truth. The goal of this talk is not to criticize psychometrics for supporting these values but rather to bring them into the open, and to encourage psychometricians to enter the debate on the moral dimensions of their field. 

 

Dr. Lisa Wijsen is a member of the Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Psychological Methods, at the University of Amsterdam. Her work centers on the history and philosophy underlying psychometrics, which has been published in outlets such as Perspectives on Psychological Science, Psychometrika, and Disputatio.